Quantum epistemology from subquantum ontology: Quantum mechanics from theory of classical random fields
Abstract
The scientific methodology based on two descriptive levels, ontic (reality as it is) and epistemic (observational), is briefly presented. Following Schrödinger, we point to the possible gap between these two descriptions. Our main aim is to show that, although ontic entities may be unaccessible for observations, they can be useful for clarification of the physical nature of operational epistemic entities. We illustrate this thesis by the concrete example: starting with the concrete ontic model preceding quantum mechanics (the latter is treated as an epistemic model), namely, prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT), we propose the natural physical interpretation for the basic quantum mechanical entity-the quantum state ("wave function"). The correspondence PCSFT ↦ QM is not straightforward, it couples the covariance operators of classical (prequantum) random fields with the quantum density operators. We use this correspondence to clarify the physical meaning of the pure quantum state and the superposition principle-by using the formalism of classical field correlations.
- Publication:
-
Annals of Physics
- Pub Date:
- February 2017
- DOI:
- 10.1016/j.aop.2016.12.005
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1605.05907
- Bibcode:
- 2017AnPhy.377..147K
- Keywords:
-
- Subquantum models;
- Ontic-epistemic description;
- Prequantum classical statistical field theory;
- Correlations of classical random fields;
- Density operators;
- Superposition principle;
- Quantum Physics;
- Physics - History and Philosophy of Physics;
- Physics - Popular Physics
- E-Print:
- J. Russian Laser Research 38, 9-26 (2017)