Reply to "Comment on `One-state vector formalism for the evolution of a quantum state through nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers' "
Abstract
In our recent paper [Phys. Rev. A 91, 012103 (2015), 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.012103] we have provided an alternative description of a highly debated experiment by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013), 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.240402]. The former paper has been recently commented on by Vaidman [Phys. Rev. A 93, 036103 (2016), 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.036103]. In this Reply we demonstrate that the comments are either invalid or, where valid, do not affect the results of our original paper.
- Publication:
-
Physical Review A
- Pub Date:
- March 2016
- DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.036104
- Bibcode:
- 2016PhRvA..93c6104B