SOFIA Observations of the Type IIn Supernova 2010jl

We present results from SOFIA mid-infrared (IR) observations of the recent Type IIn supernova (SN IIn) 2010jl. SNe IIn, named for their relatively narrow emission lines, are a somewhat rare subclass of SNe, composing less than 10% of all core-collapse events. However, they account for more than half of all known SNe with late-time (> 100 days) infrared excess, implying the presence of warm dust. Their narrow lines are formed in the interaction of the ejecta with a dense, slowly moving, pre-existing circumstellar medium (CSM), implying extraordinarily mass loss rates (as high as a tenth of a solar mass per year). Fox et al. (2011) showed, via a warm-mission Spitzer survey of SNe IIn, that the observed IR emission is consistent with pre-existing CSM dust, heated by the optical emission generated by the interaction of the forward shock with the dense CSM, and not from ejecta dust like most core-collapse SNe. Characterizing this dust reveals unique information about the pre-SN environment and the mass-loss history of the progenitor. A key question involves the type of dust grain, silicates or carbonaceous, formed in the pre-SN wind.Most proposed progenitors for SNe IIn (red supergiants, luminous blue variables, yellow hypergiants, and B[e] supergiants) show silicate dust in their pre-SN outflows. Carbonaceous dust grains are only observed in the outflows from Wolf-Rayet stars, which have a much lower mass rate and are generally believed to explode as Type Ib/c SNe, and not Type IIn. With only Spitzer data, it is impossible to distinguish between silicate and carbonaceous dust grains. However, the strong 9.7 micron silicate feature would show up in mid-IR observations. SN 2010jl was observed by SOFIA for a total of 6400 s at 11.1 microns, and we report no detection of the SN, consistent with the presence of carbonaceous dust. Our upper limit is roughly an order of magnitude lower than would be expected for silicate dust grains. Either the progenitor system for this SN IIn was not one of the proposed types listed above or the system evolved into the WR phase just prior to exploding, either of which has interesting implications for SNe IIn.