Space agencies' scientific roadmaps need harmonisation and reegular re-assessment
Abstract
The need to consider international collaboration in the exploration of space has been recognised since the dawn of the space age in 1957. Since then, international collaboration has been the main operational working mode amongst space scientists the world over, setting aside national pre-eminence and other political arguments. COSPAR itself was created as a tool for scientists to maintain the dialogue at the time of the cold war. Similarly the inherent constraints of the field (cost, complexity, time span) have led space agencies to try and coordinate their efforts. As a result many - if not all - of the key space science missions since the 60’s have been collaborative by nature. Different collaboration models have existed with varying success, and the corresponding lessons learned have been assessed through various fora and reports. For various reasons whose scope has broadened since that time (use of space in other domains such as Earth observation, telecommunication and navigation; emergence of commercial space activities; increased public appeal and capacity to motivate the young generation to engage into related careers), the importance of international collaboration in space has never faltered and coordination among spacefaring nations has become the norm. However programme harmonisation is often found to be lacking, and duplication of efforts sometimes happens due to different planning and decision procedures, programmatic timelines or budgetary constraints. Previous studies, in particular by the European ESSC-ESF, with input from the US NAS-SSB, advocated the need to establish a coordinating body involving major space agencies to address these coordination issues in a systematic and harmonious way. Since then and in line with this recommendation, the International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) of 14 space agencies was created in 2007 and published a first roadmap to advance a “Global Exploration Strategy”. ISECG is non-binding though and recent examples of lack of coordination in international planning probably indicate that this should be brought to a higher, more systematic level of coordination. Even more recently, discussions i.e. at the ISECG level, have led this forum to envisage setting up a Science Working Group to inform ISECG on ways to better coordinate the “…interaction between the exploration community…” (i.e. agencies) and the “…scientific community”. Following the recommendations by ESSC-ESF, the need for a rational and systematic approach to the harmonisation of agencies’ scientific roadmaps should be undertaken on a regular basis (ideally on an annual basis), through an inter-agency scientific collaboration working group, which would include agency executives but also scientific membership chosen after appropriate consultation. The ISECG Science Working Group could serve as an embryo to this inter-agency body. The presentation will offer prospects for the establishment of such a body and suggestions on its operating mode.
- Publication:
-
40th COSPAR Scientific Assembly
- Pub Date:
- 2014
- Bibcode:
- 2014cosp...40E3649W