Cophenetic metrics for phylogenetic trees, after Sokal and Rohlf
Abstract
Phylogenetic tree comparison metrics are an important tool in the study of evolution, and hence the definition of such metrics is an interesting problem in phylogenetics. In a paper in Taxon fifty years ago, Sokal and Rohlf proposed to measure quantitatively the difference between a pair of phylogenetic trees by first encoding them by means of their half-matrices of cophenetic values, and then comparing these matrices. This idea has been used several times since then to define dissimilarity measures between phylogenetic trees but, to our knowledge, no proper metric on weighted phylogenetic trees with nested taxa based on this idea has been formally defined and studied yet. Actually, the cophenetic values of pairs of different taxa alone are not enough to single out phylogenetic trees with weighted arcs or nested taxa. In this paper we define a family of cophenetic metrics that compare phylogenetic trees on a same set of taxa by encoding them by means of their vectors of cophenetic values of pairs of taxa and depths of single taxa, and then computing the $L^p$ norm of the difference of the corresponding vectors. Then, we study, either analytically or numerically, some of their basic properties: neighbors, diameter, distribution, and their rank correlation with each other and with other metrics.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- January 2013
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1301.4640
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1301.4640
- Bibcode:
- 2013arXiv1301.4640C
- Keywords:
-
- Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution
- E-Print:
- The "authors' cut" of a paper published in BMC Bioinformatics 14:3 (2013). 46 pages