Impact of orbit, clock and EOP errors in GNSS Precise Point Positioning
Abstract
Precise point positioning (PPP; [1]) has gained ever-increasing usage in GNSS carrier-phase positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) since its inception in the late 1990s. In this technique, high-precision satellite clocks, satellite ephemerides and earth-orientation parameters (EOPs) are applied as fixed input by the user in order to estimate receiver/location-specific quantities such as antenna coordinates, troposphere delay and receiver-clock corrections. This is in contrast to "network" solutions, in which (typically) less-precise satellite clocks, satellite ephemerides and EOPs are used as input, and in which these parameters are estimated simultaneously with the receiver/location-specific parameters. The primary reason for increased PPP application is that it offers most of the benefits of a network solution with a smaller computing cost. In addition, the software required to do PPP positioning can be simpler than that required for network solutions. Finally, PPP permits high-precision positioning of single or sparsely spaced receivers that may have few or no GNSS satellites in common view. A drawback of PPP is that the accuracy of the results depend directly on the accuracy of the supplied orbits, clocks and EOPs, since these parameters are not adjusted during the processing. In this study, we will examine the impact of orbit, EOP and satellite clock estimates on PPP solutions. Our primary focus will be the impact of these errors on station coordinates; however the study may be extended to error propagation into receiver-clock corrections and/or troposphere estimates if time permits. Study motivation: the United States Naval Observatory (USNO) began testing PPP processing using its own predicted orbits, clocks and EOPs in Summer 2012 [2]. The results of such processing could be useful for real- or near-real-time applications should they meet accuracy/precision requirements. Understanding how errors in satellite clocks, satellite orbits and EOPs propagate into PPP positioning and timing results allows researchers to focus their improvement efforts in areas most in need of attention. The initial study will be conducted using the simulation capabilities of Bernese GPS Software and extended to using real data if time permits. [1] J.F. Zumberge, M.B. Heflin, D.C. Jefferson, M.M. Watkins and F.H. Webb, Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks, J. Geophys. Res., 102(B3), 5005-5017, doi:10.1029/96JB03860, 1997. [2] C. Hackman, S.M. Byram, V.J. Slabinski and J.C. Tracey, Near-real-time and other high-precision GNSS-based orbit/clock/earth-orientation/troposphere parameters available from USNO, Proc. 2012 ION Joint Navigation Conference, 15 pp., in press, 2012.
- Publication:
-
AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts
- Pub Date:
- December 2012
- Bibcode:
- 2012AGUFM.G13C..01H
- Keywords:
-
- 1200 GEODESY AND GRAVITY;
- 1240 GEODESY AND GRAVITY / Satellite geodesy: results;
- 1241 GEODESY AND GRAVITY / Satellite geodesy: technical issues