A Writing Intensive Course in "Natural Disasters: Geoethics and the Layman"
Abstract
One course with a contemporary ethics focus is a graduation requirement under the University of Hawaii at Manoa's General Education rules. The goal of the University of Hawaii General Education Committee is to encourage faculty to design ethics-focus courses for each field of undergraduate concentration. Undergraduate students are also required to take 5 writing intensive courses. It is permitted to combine the ethics and writing intensive foci in a given course, as long as one third of the course is devoted to each focus. The course I designed uses current disasters as the subject matter, thus course content varies from year to year. The prerequisite for enrollment is one introductory course in geoscience, to ensure students are familiar with basic geologic processes. I bring in geo-professionals, active in the fields we study, to discuss with students the realities of dealing with civil authorities, elected officials, the media, and the public during a natural disaster. This is one of the aspects of the course the students most enjoy. Such a course could be designed for any locality. Learning outcomes by which the students' work is assessed are as follows. The best student: (1) clearly identifies the inherent ethical choices and implications involved in the professional geoscientist's role during contemporary natural hazard situations; (2) gives evidence of understanding the effects of perspective, context, personal views as pertains to natural hazards; (3) specifies the decision-makers and stakeholders involved in hazard situations; (4) integrates clear descriptions of relevant ethical ambiguities/dilemmas into the overall analysis of a given hazard situation; (5) draws upon frameworks, principles of ethics to develop pertinent arguments and/or positions; (6) develops and presents alternate arguments/positions; (7) discusses and/or debates ethical issues with sensitivity to others' perspectives and the context, while also defending own position with logic and fact; (8) makes a reasoned judgment that takes into account an array of arguments and perspectives; (9) shows evidence of a logical, systematic decision-making process. Weekly writing assignments and term papers that assess the ethical aspects of actions taken by stakeholders in various disaster situations are required and feedback from both classmates and instructor offer the student an opportunity to revise drafts and thus improve both writing skills and grade. Grades are based on class participation and attendance (50%), writing assignments (30%), term paper (10%), and a final exam (10%). Student assessments of the course have been very positive over the past 3 years (average score of 4.7 out of 5).
- Publication:
-
AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts
- Pub Date:
- December 2011
- Bibcode:
- 2011AGUFMED31A0704F
- Keywords:
-
- 0820 EDUCATION / Curriculum and laboratory design;
- 4300 NATURAL HAZARDS