Advantages and Challenges in using Multi-Sensor Data for Studying Aerosols from Space
Abstract
We are living now in the golden era of numerous sensors measuring aerosols from space, e.g., MODIS, MISR, MERIS, OMI, POLDER, etc. Data from multiple sensors provide a more complete coverage of physical phenomena than data from a single sensor. These sensors are rather different from each other, are sensitive to various parts of the atmosphere, use different aerosol models and treat surface differently when retrieving aerosols. However, they complement each other thus providing more information about spatial, vertical and temporal distribution of aerosols. In addition to differences in instrumentation, retrieval algorithms and calibration, there are quite substantial differences in processing algorithms from Level 0 up to Level 3 and 4. Some of these differences in processing steps, at times not well documented and not widely known by users, can lead to quite significant differences in final products. Without documenting all the steps leading to the final product, data users will not trust the data and/or may use data incorrectly. Data by themselves without quality assessment and provenance are not sufficient to make accurate scientific conclusions. In this paper we provide examples of striking differences between aerosol optical depth data from MODIS, MISR, and MERIS that can be attributed to differences in a certain threshold, aggregation methods, and the dataday definition. We talk about challenges in developing processing provenance. Also, we address issues of harmonization of data, quality and provenance that is needed to guide the multi-sensor data usage and avoid apples-to-oranges comparison and fusion.
- Publication:
-
38th COSPAR Scientific Assembly
- Pub Date:
- 2010
- Bibcode:
- 2010cosp...38...48L