Skiff-based Sonar/LiDAR Survey to Calibrate Reservoir Volumes for Watershed Sediment Yield Studies: Carmel River Example

Models of watershed sediment yield are complicated by spatial and temporal variability of geologic substrate, land cover, and precipitation parameters. Episodic events such as ENSO cycles and severe wildfire are frequent enough to matter in the long-term average yield, and they can produce short-lived, extreme geomorphic responses. The sediment yield from extreme events is difficult to accurately capture because of the obvious dangers associated with field measurements during flood conditions, but it is critical to include extreme values for developing realistic models of rainfall-sediment yield relations, and for calculating long term average denudation rates. Dammed rivers provide a time-honored natural laboratory for quantifying average annual sediment yield and extreme-event sediment yield. While lead-line surveys of the past provided crude estimates of reservoir sediment trapping, recent advances in geospatial technology now provide unprecedented opportunities to improve volume change measurements. High-precision digital elevation models surveyed on an annual basis, or before-and-after specific rainfall-runoff events can be used to quantify relations between rainfall and sediment yield as a function of landscape parameters, including spatially explicit fire intensity. The Basin-Complex Fire of June and July 2008 resulted in moderate to severe burns in the 114 km^2 portion of the Carmel River watershed above Los Padres Dam. The US Geological Survey produced a debris flow probability/volume model for the region indicating that the reservoir could lose considerable capacity if intense enough precipitation occurred in the 2009-10 winter. Loss of Los Padres reservoir capacity has implications for endangered steelhead and red-legged frogs, and groundwater on municipal water supply. In anticipation of potentially catastrophic erosion, we produced an accurate volume calculation of the Los Padres reservoir in fall 2009, and locally monitored hillslope and fluvial processes during winter months. The pre-runoff reservoir volume was developed by collecting and merging sonar and LiDAR data from a small research skiff equipped with a high-precision positioning and attitude-correcting system. The terrestrial LiDAR data were augmented with shore-based total station positioning. Watershed monitoring included benchmarked serial stream surveys and semi-quantitative assessment of a variety of near-channel colluvial processes. Rainfall in the 2009-10 water year was not intense enough to trigger widespread debris flows of slope failure in the burned watershed, but dry ravel was apparently accelerated. The geomorphic analysis showed that sediment yield was not significantly higher during this low-rainfall year, despite the wide-spread presence of very steep, fire-impacted slopes. Because there was little to no increase in sediment yield this year, we have postponed our second reservoir survey. A predicted ENSO event that might bring very intense rains to the watershed is currently predicted for winter 2009-10.