Verification and Validation (V&V) Methodologies for Multiphase Turbulent and Explosive Flows. V&V Case Studies of Computer Simulations from Los Alamos National Laboratory GMFIX codes
Abstract
Large-scale volcanic eruptions are inherently hazardous events, hence cannot be described by detailed and accurate in situ measurements; hence, volcanic explosive phenomenology is inadequately constrained in terms of initial and inflow conditions. Consequently, little to no real-time data exist to Verify and Validate computer codes developed to model these geophysical events as a whole. However, code Verification and Validation remains a necessary step, particularly when volcanologists use numerical data for mitigation of volcanic hazards as more often performed nowadays. The Verification and Validation (V&V) process formally assesses the level of 'credibility' of numerical results produced within a range of specific applications. The first step, Verification, is 'the process of determining that a model implementation accurately represents the conceptual description of the model', which requires either exact analytical solutions or highly accurate simplified experimental data. The second step, Validation, is 'the process of determining the degree to which a model is an accurate representation of the real world', which requires complex experimental data of the 'real world' physics. The Verification step is rather simple to formally achieve, while, in the 'real world' explosive volcanism context, the second step, Validation, is about impossible. Hence, instead of validating computer code against the whole large-scale unconstrained volcanic phenomenology, we rather suggest to focus on the key physics which control these volcanic clouds, viz., momentum-driven supersonic jets and multiphase turbulence. We propose to compare numerical results against a set of simple but well-constrained analog experiments, which uniquely and unambiguously represent these two key-phenomenology separately. Herewith, we use GMFIX (Geophysical Multiphase Flow with Interphase eXchange, v1.62), a set of multiphase- CFD FORTRAN codes, which have been recently redeveloped to meet the strict Quality Assurance, verification, and validation requirements from the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management of the US Dept of Energy. GMFIX solves Navier-Stokes and energy partial differential equations for each phase with appropriate turbulence and interfacial coupling between phases. For momentum-driven single- to multi-phase underexpanded jets, the position of the first Mach disk is known empirically as a function of both the pressure ratio, K, and the particle mass fraction, Phi at the nozzle. Namely, the higher K, the further downstream the Mach disk and the higher Phi, the further upstream the first Mach disk. We show that GMFIX captures these two essential features. In addition, GMFIX displays all the properties found in these jets, such as expansion fans, incident and reflected shocks, and subsequent downstream mach discs, which make this code ideal for further investigations of equivalent volcanological phenomena. One of the other most challenging aspects of volcanic phenomenology is the multiphase nature of turbulence. We also validated GMFIX in comparing the velocity profiles and turbulence quantities against well constrained analog experiments. The velocity profiles agree with the analog ones as well as these of production of turbulent quantities. Overall, the Verification and the Validation experiments although inherently challenging suggest GMFIX captures the most essential dynamical properties of multiphase and supersonic flows and jets.
- Publication:
-
AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts
- Pub Date:
- December 2006
- Bibcode:
- 2006AGUFM.V43C1821D
- Keywords:
-
- 0545 Modeling (4255);
- 0550 Model verification and validation;
- 4490 Turbulence (3379;
- 4568;
- 7863);
- 4568 Turbulence;
- diffusion;
- and mixing processes (4490);
- 8428 Explosive volcanism