Channel Formation in Physical Experiments: Examples from Deep and Shallow Water Clastic Sedimentary Systems

The degree to which experimental sedimentary systems form channels has an important bearing on their applicability as analogs of large-scale natural systems, where channels and their associated landforms are ubiquitous. The internal geometry and properties (e.g., grain size, vertical succession and stacking) of many depositional landforms can be directly linked to the processes of channel initiation and evolution. Unfortunately, strong self-channelization, a prerequisite for certain natural phenomena (e.g. mouth lobe development, meandering, etc.), has been difficult to reproduce at laboratory scales. In shallow-water experiments (sub-aerial), although weak channelization develops relatively easily, as is commonly observed in gutters after a rain storm, strong channelization with well-developed banks has proved difficult to model. In deep water experiments the challenge is even greater. Despite considerable research effort experimental conditions for deep water channel initiation have only recently been identified. Experiments on the requisite conditions for channelization in shallow and deep water have been ongoing at the ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company (EMURC) for several years. By primarily manipulating the cohesiveness of the sediment supply we have developed models of distributive systems with well-defined channels in shallow water, reminiscent of fine grained river-dominated deltas like the Mississippi. In deep water we have developed models that demonstrate strong channelization and associated lobe behavior in a distributive setting, by scaling up an approach developed by another group using salt-water flows and low-density plastic sediment. The experiments highlight a number of important controls on experimental channel formation, including: (1) bed strength or cohesiveness; (2) bedform development; and (3) Reynolds number. Among these controls bed forms disrupt the channel forming instability, reducing the energy available for channelization. The fundamental channel instability develops in both laminar and turbulent flow but with important differences. The scaling of these effects is the focus of ongoing research. In general it was observed that there are strong similarities between the processes and sedimentary products in shallow and deep water systems. Further, strong channelization in EMURC experiments provides insights into the evolution of distributive systems including: (1) the cyclic process of lobe formation and channel growth at a channel mouth, (2) types of channel fill, (3) architectural differences between channel fill and lobe deposits, (4) channel backfilling and avulsion, (5) Channel initiation vs. entrenched channel phases, (6) knickpoints and channel erosion, (7) structure of overbank, levee-building flows, and (8) the role of levees in altering the distributive channel pattern.