"Propellers" in Saturns Rings? The missing Link?
Abstract
To date it is not clear how planetary rings have formed. Have they either accreted cogenetically with their central planet and its satellite system or has a catastrophic disruption of a parent body (satellite, comet) created these magnificent cosmic structures? Based upon dynamical arguments the former scenario would ab initio exclude the existence of boulders larger than a few 10 meters in diameter because they cannot stand the planet's tides and collisions. Consequently, if there were such moonlets with sizes between 50 meters up to few kilometers in diameter in the rings a strong argument pro the hypothesis of a "violent birth" of these cosmic disks would have been found! In order to improve or even enable the detectability of such moonlets, we have modeled structures created by such larger ring boulders. We derived a hydrodynamical model describing the combination of counteracting processes of gravitational scattering and nonlinear viscous diffusion. A formation of a "propeller-shaped" structure (Spahn & Sremcevic; A&A 358 (2000), 368) interfered with density wakes have been obtained which scale in radial direction with the Hill radius and azimuthally with the ratio of mass to viscosity of the ring material (Sremcevic et al.; MNRAS 337 (2002), 1139). The formation of the "propellers" flanked by density wakes have been confirmed by numerical particle simulations (Seiss et al. GRL 32 (2005)). These results have been used to search for small embedded satellites in Saturn's rings in the Cassini imaging data (ISS). Two kilometer sized moonlets have already been detected in Saturn's A ring - Pan and Daphnis - which both show all essential density features and scalings. However, these two isolated,large ring-boulders cannot serve yet as a proof for an extended size-distribution which is expected to result from a catastrophic disruption of an icy satellite. The detection of four "Propellers" pointing to moonlets of ca. 40 - 120 metres in size by Tiscareno et al. (Nature 440 (2006), 648; Spahn & Schmidt, ibid, p. 614) seems to close the gap in the knowledge - providing a strong argument in favour of the "catastrophic disruption" origin scenario.
- Publication:
-
European Planetary Science Congress 2006
- Pub Date:
- 2006
- Bibcode:
- 2006epsc.conf..298S