The effect of explicit, inquiry instruction on freshman college science majors' understanding of the nature of science
Abstract
Reform efforts have placed strong emphasis on teaching practices that should help students learn about the nature of science. Researchers have examined two general instructional approaches, explicit and implicit, believed to be useful in teaching science. Of these two approaches, researchers emphasize explicit instruction as the more effective approach when enhancing students' views of the scientific endeavor (Abd-El-Khalick & Lederman, 2000; Bell, 2001; Billeh & Hasan, 1975; Carey & Stauss, 1968; Schwartz et al., 2000). Furthermore, recent studies (Schwartz et al ., 2000, 2001) indicate that teaching science inquiry through investigative activities and reflective discussions have demonstrated to be most effective for understanding science. The purpose of this study was to describe the effect of explicit, inquiry instruction on the understanding of freshman college science majors regarding the nature of science. Participants included 74 freshman college science majors, 50 students in the experimental group and 24 students in the control group. The experimental group was exposed to the treatment of the study, which took place in a Succeeding in Science course. The course content included explicit instruction on the nature of science, emphasizing scientific inquiry and the processes that scientists carry out in their work. The course reflected three aspects of inquiry-based science that are discussed in the Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards (2000) which are (1) to learn the principles and concepts of science; (2) to participate in scientific investigations; and (3) to reflect on the epistemology of science. The research design of this study used a pretest-posttest instrument, The Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire Form C (VNOS-C) (Lederman et al., 2001) and an essay paper at the end of the course to assess students' understanding about the nature of science. The results from the VNOS-C were analyzed using analysis of covariance in which the dependent variable was student understanding of science as measured by the posttest, and the covariate was student understanding of nature of science as measured by the pretest. The results indicated that the understanding of the nature of science of freshman college science majors who have participated in explicit, inquiry instruction is statistically greater than the understanding of the nature of science of freshman college science majors who have participated in traditional instruction. The essays provided insight into the apparent increase in student understanding of the nature of science. The results from pretesting and posttesting indicated that a one-semester credit hour course, which focuses directly on teaching about the nature of science can improve freshman science majors' understanding of the nature of science.
- Publication:
-
Ph.D. Thesis
- Pub Date:
- 2003
- Bibcode:
- 2003PhDT........29K