On local-hidden-variable no-go theorems
Abstract
The strongest attack against quantum mechanics came in 1935 in the form of a paper by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen. It was argued that the theory of quantum mechanics could not be called a complete theory of Nature, for every element of reality is not represented in the formalism as such. The authors then put forth a proposition: we must search for a theory where, upon knowing everything about the system, including possible hidden variables, one could make precise predictions concerning elements of reality. This project was ultimately doomed in 1964 with the work of Bell, who showed that the most general local hidden variable theory could not reproduce correlations that arise in quantum mechanics. There exist mainly three forms of no-go theorems for local hidden variable theories. Although almost every physicist knows the consequences of these no-go theorems, not every physicist is aware of the distinctions between the three or even their exact definitions. Thus, we will discuss here the three principal forms of no-go theorems for local hidden variable theories of Nature. We will define Bell theorems, Bell theorems without inequalities, and pseudo-telepathy. A discussion of the similarities and differences will follow.
- Publication:
-
Canadian Journal of Physics
- Pub Date:
- June 2006
- DOI:
- arXiv:
- arXiv:quant-ph/0507149
- Bibcode:
- 2006CaJPh..84..633M
- Keywords:
-
- QUANTUM-MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION;
- PHYSICAL REALITY;
- PSEUDO-TELEPATHY;
- Quantum Physics
- E-Print:
- 7 pages, no figure, replaced "Bell inequalities" with "Bell theorems" and updated the references