Generalized Intersection Bodies are not Equivalent
Abstract
In 2000, A. Koldobsky asked whether two types of generalizations of the notion of an intersection-body, are in fact equivalent. The structures of these two types of generalized intersection-bodies have been studied by the author in [http://www.arxiv.org/math.MG/0512058], providing substantial positive evidence for a positive answer to this question. The purpose of this note is to construct a counter-example, which provides a surprising negative answer to this question in a strong sense. This implies the existence of non-trivial non-negative functions in the range of the spherical Radon transform, and the existence of non-trivial spaces which embed in L_p for certain negative values of p.
- Publication:
-
arXiv Mathematics e-prints
- Pub Date:
- January 2007
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.math/0701779
- arXiv:
- arXiv:math/0701779
- Bibcode:
- 2007math......1779M
- Keywords:
-
- Mathematics - Functional Analysis
- E-Print:
- 18 pages, added a section with equivalent formulations using Fourier Transforms and Embeddings into L_p for p<