Correction note. Typical configuration for one-dimensional random field Kac model
Abstract
Estimate (3.39) which appears in the proof of Proposition 3.4 in [Ann. Probab. 27 (1999) 1414--1467, doi:10.1214/aop/1022677454] is wrong. We present below a corrected proof which introduces an extra factor 2 in equations (3.34) and (3.35). This has no consequence in the rest of the paper since Proposition 3.4 is used to estimate only ratios; see (3.23) and (3.25).
- Publication:
-
arXiv Mathematics e-prints
- Pub Date:
- September 2006
- DOI:
- arXiv:
- arXiv:math/0609719
- Bibcode:
- 2006math......9719C
- Keywords:
-
- Mathematics - Probability;
- 60K35;
- 82B20;
- 82B43 (Primary)
- E-Print:
- Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/009117906000000160 in the Annals of Probability (http://www.imstat.org/aop/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)