Amazons is PSPACE-complete
Abstract
Amazons is a board game which combines elements of Chess and Go. It has become popular in recent years, and has served as a useful platform for both game-theoretic study and AI games research. Buro showed that simple Amazons endgames are NP-equivalent, leaving the complexity of the general case as an open problem. We settle this problem, by showing that deciding the outcome of an n x n Amazons position is PSPACE-hard. We give a reduction from one of the PSPACE-complete two-player formula games described by Schaefer. Since the number of moves in an Amazons game is polynomially bounded (unlike Chess and Go), Amazons is in PSPACE. It is thus on a par with other two-player, bounded-move, perfect-information games such as Hex, Othello, and Kayles. Our construction also provides an alternate proof that simple Amazons endgames are NP-equivalent. Our reduction uses a number of amazons polynomial in the input formula length; a remaining open problem is the complexity of Amazons when only a constant number of amazons is used.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- February 2005
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.cs/0502013
- arXiv:
- arXiv:cs/0502013
- Bibcode:
- 2005cs........2013H
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computational Complexity;
- Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory;
- F.2.2
- E-Print:
- 7 pages, 5 figures. For 2005 Combinatorial Game Theory Workshop at BIRS