Responsibility and blame: a structural-model approach
Abstract
Causality is typically treated an all-or-nothing concept; either A is a cause of B or it is not. We extend the definition of causality introduced by Halpern and Pearl [2001] to take into account the degree of responsibility of A for B. For example, if someone wins an election 11--0, then each person who votes for him is less responsible for the victory than if he had won 6--5. We then define a notion of degree of blame, which takes into account an agent's epistemic state. Roughly speaking, the degree of blame of A for B is the expected degree of responsibility of A for B, taken over the epistemic state of an agent.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- December 2003
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.cs/0312038
- arXiv:
- arXiv:cs/0312038
- Bibcode:
- 2003cs.......12038C
- Keywords:
-
- Artificial Intelligence;
- Logic in Computer Science;
- I.2.1