Query Complexity: Worst-Case Quantum Versus Average-Case Classical
Abstract
In this note we investigate the relationship between worst-case quantum query complexity and average-case classical query complexity. Specifically, we show that if a quantum computer can evaluate a total Boolean function f with bounded error using T queries in the worst case, then a deterministic classical computer can evaluate f using O(T^5) queries in the average case, under a uniform distribution of inputs. If f is monotone, we show furthermore that only O(T^3) queries are needed. Previously, Beals et al. (1998) showed that if a quantum computer can evaluate f with bounded error using T queries in the worst case, then a deterministic classical computer can evaluate f using O(T^6) queries in the worst case, or O(T^4) if f is monotone. The optimal bound is conjectured to be O(T^2), but improving on O(T^6) remains an open problem. Relating worst-case quantum complexity to average-case classical complexity may suggest new ways to reduce the polynomial gap in the ordinary worst-case versus worst-case setting.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- January 2000
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.cs/0001013
- arXiv:
- arXiv:cs/0001013
- Bibcode:
- 2000cs........1013A
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computational Complexity;
- Quantum Physics;
- F.1.2
- E-Print:
- Withdrawn. The results in the paper only work for a certain subclass of Boolean functions, in which block sensitivity has properties similar to those of ordinary sensitivity. They don't work in general