Comment on ``Theory of tailoring sonic devices: Diffraction dominates over refraction''
Abstract
Recently, <article>García et al. [Phys. Rev. E 67, 046606 (2003)]</article> studied theoretically several acoustic devices with dimensions on the order of several wavelengths. Those authors also discussed experimental results previously reported by several of us [<article>Cervera et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 023902 (2002)</article>] and concluded that it is diffraction rather than refraction that is the dominating mechanism explaining the focusing effects observed in those experiments. In this Comment we reexamined their calculations and discussed why some of their interpretations of our results are misleading.
- Publication:
-
Physical Review E
- Pub Date:
- January 2005
- DOI:
- arXiv:
- arXiv:cond-mat/0405181
- Bibcode:
- 2005PhRvE..71a8601H
- Keywords:
-
- 43.38.+n;
- 42.70.Qs;
- 62.65.+k;
- Transduction;
- acoustical devices for the generation and reproduction of sound;
- Photonic bandgap materials;
- Acoustical properties of solids;
- Condensed Matter - Materials Science
- E-Print:
- 2 pages, 2 figures, a comment on an article