An X-Ray Cluster at Redshift 2.156?: Erratum

In the Letter, ``An X-Ray Cluster at Redshift 2.156?'' by C. L. Carilli, D. E. Harris, L. Pentericci, H. J. A. Röttgering, G. K. Miley, and M. N. Bremer (ApJ, 494, L143 [1998]), a third possible explanation for the X-ray emission from the z=2.156 radio galaxy 1138-262 is thermal emission from a very dense, subcluster ``halo,'' perhaps associated with the (forming) cD galaxy on a scale <=100 kpc. For instance, increasing the gas density from 0.01 to 0.1 cm^-3 would decrease the required hot gas mass by the same factor (at fixed X-ray luminosity) and could possibly alleviate constraints on cosmological structure formation models. The pressure in this gas would be very high (10^-9 dyn cm^-2), comparable to the pressure in the optical line-emitting nebulosity and to the minimum pressure in the radio source, and the cooling time would be short (<=a few × 10⁸ yr). Circumstantial evidence for such very dense, hot gas enveloping some high-z radio sources has been reviewed by Fabian et al. (1986). Fabian (1991) suggests that in some cases the ``inferred pressures are close to the maximum that can be obtained by gas cooling in a potential well of a galaxy'' (i.e., the cooling time ~ gravitational free-fall time), and he designates such systems as ``maximal cooling flows,'' with implied cooling flow rates up to 2000 M_solar yr^-1. High-resolution X-ray imaging with AXAF should be able to test whether 1138-262 has a normal cluster atmosphere, a ``maximal cooling flow,'' or an unusually X-ray-loud active galactic nucleus.

We would like to thank W. Forman, F. Owen, and A. Fabian, for useful discussions on this issue.