Criticism of recent calculations of common envelope ejection
Abstract
We re-examine a recent claim made by Han et al. that the ionization energy in the envelope has to be included in the ejection criterion of common envelopes. In particular, we argue that: (i) they include a mass-loss rate prior to the onset of the common envelope that is too low; (ii) they do not include the energy radiated by the accreting white dwarf companion, as well as that emitted by the core of the giant star; and (iii) as argued by one of us previously, the opacity in the envelope is too low for the efficient usage of the ionization energy.
- Publication:
-
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Pub Date:
- August 2003
- DOI:
- 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06689.x
- arXiv:
- arXiv:astro-ph/0209141
- Bibcode:
- 2003MNRAS.343..456S
- Keywords:
-
- stars: AGB and post-AGB;
- binaries: close;
- stars: evolution;
- stars: mass-loss;
- Astrophysics
- E-Print:
- MNRAS, accepted