Evidence against or for topological defects in the BOOMERanG data?
Abstract
The recently released BOOMERanG data were taken as ``contradicting topological defect predictions.'' We show that such a statement is partly misleading. Indeed, the presence of a series of acoustic peaks is perfectly compatible with a non-negligible topological defect contribution. In such a mixed perturbation model (inflation and topological defects) for the source of primordial fluctuations, the natural prediction is a slightly lower amplitude for the Doppler peaks, a feature shared by many other purely inflationary models. Thus, for the moment, it seems difficult to rule out these models with the current data.
- Publication:
-
Physical Review D
- Pub Date:
- December 2001
- DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.021301
- arXiv:
- arXiv:astro-ph/0005022
- Bibcode:
- 2001PhRvD..65b1301B
- Keywords:
-
- 98.70.Vc;
- 98.80.Cq;
- Background radiations;
- Particle-theory and field-theory models of the early Universe;
- Astrophysics
- E-Print:
- 4 pages, 1 figure. Some changes following extraordinarily slow referee Reports and new data. Main results unchanged (sorry)