The Impact of Question Framing on the Precision of Automatic Occupation Coding

Occupational data play a vital role in research, official statistics, and policymaking, yet their collection and accurate classification remain a persistent challenge. This study investigates the effects of occupational question wording on data variability and the performance of automatic coding tools. Through a series of survey experiments conducted and replicated in Germany, we tested two widely-used occupational question formats: one focusing on "job title" (Berufsbezeichnung) and another on "occupational tasks" (berufliche Tätigkeit). Our analysis reveals that automatic coding tools, such as CASCOT and OccuCoDe, exhibit significant sensitivity to the form and origin of the data. Specifically, these tools performed more efficiently when coding responses to the job title question format compared to the occupational task format. Additionally, we found that including examples of main tasks and duties in the questions led respondents to provide more detailed but less linguistically diverse responses. This reduced diversity may negatively affect the precision of automatic coding. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring automatic coding tools to the specific structure and origin of the data they are applied to. We emphasize the need for further research to optimize question design and coding tools for greater accuracy and applicability in occupational data collection.