ANID: How Far Are We? Evaluating the Discrepancies Between AI-synthesized Images and Natural Images through Multimodal Guidance

In the rapidly evolving field of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC), one of the key challenges is distinguishing AI-synthesized images from natural images. Despite the remarkable capabilities of advanced AI generative models in producing visually compelling images, significant discrepancies remain when these images are compared to natural ones. To systematically investigate and quantify these discrepancies, we introduce an AI-Natural Image Discrepancy Evaluation benchmark aimed at addressing the critical question: \textit{how far are AI-generated images (AIGIs) from truly realistic images?} We have constructed a large-scale multimodal dataset, the Distinguishing Natural and AI-generated Images (DNAI) dataset, which includes over 440,000 AIGI samples generated by 8 representative models using both unimodal and multimodal prompts, such as Text-to-Image (T2I), Image-to-Image (I2I), and Text \textit{vs.} Image-to-Image (TI2I). Our fine-grained assessment framework provides a comprehensive evaluation of the DNAI dataset across five key dimensions: naive visual feature quality, semantic alignment in multimodal generation, aesthetic appeal, downstream task applicability, and coordinated human validation. Extensive evaluation results highlight significant discrepancies across these dimensions, underscoring the necessity of aligning quantitative metrics with human judgment to achieve a holistic understanding of AI-generated image quality. Code is available at \href{https://github.com/ryliu68/ANID}{https://github.com/ryliu68/ANID}.