Interval Multiplicities of Persistence Modules
Abstract
For any persistence module $M$ over a finite poset $\mathbf{P}$, and any interval $I$ in $\mathbf{P}$, we give a formula of the multiplicity $d_M(V_I)$ of the interval module $V_I$ in the indecomposable decomposition of $M$ in terms of structure linear maps of the module $M$. This makes it possible to compute the maximal interval-decomposable direct summand of $M$, which gives us a way to decide whether $M$ is interval-decomposable or not. Moreover, the formula tells us essential morphisms of $\mathbf{P}$ that are necessary to compute the multiplicity $d_M(V_I)$. This suggests us some poset morphism $\zeta \colon Z \to \mathbf{P}$ such that the induced restriction functor $R \colon \operatorname{mod} \mathbf{P} \to \operatorname{mod} Z$ has the property that the multiplicity $d:= d_{R(M)}(R(V_I))$ is equal to $d_M(V_I)$. If $Z$ can be taken as a poset of Dynkin type $\mathbb{A}$ as in the bipath case, then the calculation of the multiplicity $d$ can be done more efficiently, starting from the filtration level of topological spaces. Thus this even makes it unnecessary to compute the structure linear maps of $M$.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- November 2024
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2411.11594
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2411.11594
- Bibcode:
- 2024arXiv241111594A
- Keywords:
-
- Mathematics - Representation Theory;
- Mathematics - Algebraic Topology;
- Mathematics - Rings and Algebras;
- 16G20 (Primary) 16G70;
- 55N31;
- 62R40 (Secondary)
- E-Print:
- 39 pages. We extended the definition of the multiplicity of an indecomposable module in the persistence module to that of a decomposable module, and slightly changed the definition of essential covering by removing the indecomposable assumption on $R(V_I)$ that appeared in the previous version