Calibrated Forecasting and Persuasion
Abstract
How should an expert send forecasts to maximize her utility subject to passing a calibration test? We consider a dynamic game where an expert sends probabilistic forecasts to a decision maker. The decision maker uses a calibration test based on past outcomes to verify the expert's forecasts. We characterize the optimal forecasting strategy by reducing the dynamic game to a static persuasion problem. A distribution of forecasts is implementable by a calibrated strategy if and only if it is a mean-preserving contraction of the distribution of conditionals (honest forecasts). We characterize the value of information by comparing what an informed and uninformed expert can attain. Moreover, we consider a decision maker who uses regret minimization, instead of the calibration test, to take actions. We show that the expert can achieve the same payoff against a regret minimizer as under the calibration test, and in some instances, she can achieve strictly more.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- June 2024
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2406.15680
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2406.15680
- Bibcode:
- 2024arXiv240615680J
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory;
- Economics - Theoretical Economics
- E-Print:
- The conference version of this work has been accepted to the Twenty-Fifth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC'24)