Pros and cons of structural chirality measurements and computation of handedness in periodic solids
Abstract
We compare the various chirality measures most widely used in the literature to quantify chiral symmetry in extended solids, i.e., the continuous chirality measure, the Hausdorff distance, and the angular momentum. By studying these functions in an algebraically tractable case, we can evaluate their strengths and weaknesses when applied to more complex crystals. Going beyond those classical calculations, we propose a new method to quantify the handedness of a crystal based on a pseudoscalar function, i.e., the helicity. This quantity, borrowed from hydrodynamics, can be computed from the eigenvector carrying the system from the high-symmetry non-chiral phase to the low-symmetry chiral phase. Different model systems like K$_3$NiO$_2$, CsCuCl$_3$ and MgTi$_2$O$_4$ are used as test cases where we show the superior interest of using helicity to quantify chirality together with the handedness distinction.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- May 2024
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2405.16268
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2405.16268
- Bibcode:
- 2024arXiv240516268G
- Keywords:
-
- Condensed Matter - Materials Science