Fight like a Woman: Domestic Violence and Female Judges in Brazil
Abstract
We investigate the impact of judges' gender on the outcome of domestic violence cases. Using data from São Paulo, Brazil, between 2010 and 2019, we compare conviction rates by judge's gender and find that a domestic violence case assigned to a female judge is 31% (10 p.p) more likely to result in conviction than a case assigned to a male judge with similar career characteristics. To show that this decision gap rises due to different gender perspectives about domestic violence instead of rising due to female judges being tougher than male judges, we compare it against gender conviction rate gaps in similar types of crimes. We find that the gender conviction rate gap for domestic violence cases is significantly larger than the same gap for other misdemeanor cases (3 p.p. larger) and for other physical assault cases (8 p.p. larger). Lastly, we find evidence that at least two channels explain this gender conviction rate gap for domestic violence cases: gender-based differences in evidence interpretation and gender-based sentencing criteria.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- May 2024
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2405.07240
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2405.07240
- Bibcode:
- 2024arXiv240507240L
- Keywords:
-
- Economics - General Economics
- E-Print:
- We included a discussion about the representational and informational accounts of gender effects in judicial decisions