A proposal to improve the calculation of the disruption index
Abstract
Wu et al. (2019) proposed the disruption index (DI1) as a bibliometric indicator that measures disruptive and consolidating research. Leibel and Bornmann (2024) recently published a literature overview on the disruption index research in Scientometrics. In this letter to the editor, we point out that the method of calculating the DI1 score of a focal paper contains a logical impact measurement error that leads to a meaningful reduction of the score. We explain why this is problematic and propose a correction of the formula.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- March 2024
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2403.11748
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2403.11748
- Bibcode:
- 2024arXiv240311748L
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Digital Libraries;
- J.4
- E-Print:
- We decided to withdraw the paper, since the relevance of the indicator improvement described in the paper has to be clarified in additional analyses