Current data are consistent with flat spatial hypersurfaces in the Λ CDM cosmological model but favor more lensing than the model predicts

We study the performance of three pairs of tilted, and a pair of untilted, Λ cold dark matter (Λ CDM ) cosmological models, with three of these four pairs allowing for nonflat spatial hypersurfaces, against cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and polarization power spectrum data (P18), measurements of the Planck 2018 lensing potential power spectrum (lensing), and a large compilation of non-CMB data (non-CMB). For the eight models, we measure cosmological parameters and study whether or not pairs of the datasets (as well as subsets of them) are mutually consistent in these models. Half of these models allow the lensing consistency parameter A_L, which rescales the gravitational potential power spectrum, to be an additional free parameter to be determined from data, while the other three have A_L=1 which is the theoretically expected value. The pair of untilted nonflat Λ CDM models are incompatible with P18 data. The tilted spatially flat models assume the usual primordial spatial inhomogeneity power spectrum that is a power law in wave number. The tilted nonflat models assume either the primordial power spectrum used in the Planck group analyses [Planck P (q )], which has recently been numerically shown to be a good approximation to what is quantum-mechanically generated from a particular choice of closed inflation model initial conditions, or a recently computed power spectrum [new P (q )] that quantum-mechanically follows from a different set of nonflat inflation model initial conditions. In the tilted nonflat models with A_L=1 , we find differences between P18 data and non-CMB data cosmological parameter constraints, which are large enough to rule out the Planck P (q ) model at 3 σ but not the new P (q ) model. No significant differences are found when cosmological parameter constraints obtained with two different datasets are compared within the standard tilted flat Λ CDM model. While both P18 data and non-CMB data separately favor a closed geometry, with spatial curvature density parameter Ω_k<0 , when P 18 +non -CMB data are jointly analyzed the evidence in favor of nonflat hypersurfaces subsides. Differences between P18 data and non-CMB data cosmological constraints subside when A_L is allowed to vary. From the most restrictive P 18 +lensing +non -CMB data combination, we get almost model-independent constraints on the cosmological parameters and find that the A_L>1 option is preferred over the Ω_k<0 one, with the A_L parameter, for all models, being larger than unity by ∼2.5 σ . According to the deviance information criterion, in the P 18 +lensing +non -CMB analysis, the varying A_L option is on the verge of being strongly favored over the A_L=1 one, which could indicate a problem for the standard tilted flat Λ CDM model. These data are consistent with flat spatial hypersurfaces but more and better data could improve the constraints on Ω_k and might alter this conclusion. Error bars on some cosmological parameters are significantly reduced when non-CMB data are used jointly with P 18 +lensing data. For example, in the tilted flat Λ CDM model for P 18 +lensing +non -CMB data, the Hubble constant H₀=68.09 ±0.38 km s^-1 Mpc^-1 , which is consistent with that from a median statistics analysis of a large compilation of H₀ measurements, as well as with a number of local measurements of the cosmological expansion rate. This H₀ error bar is 31% smaller than that from P 18 +lensing data alone.