A Two-Ball Ellsberg Paradox: An Experiment
Abstract
We conduct an incentivized experiment on a nationally representative US sample \\ (N=708) to test whether people prefer to avoid ambiguity even when it means choosing dominated options. In contrast to the literature, we find that 55\% of subjects prefer a risky act to an ambiguous act that always provides a larger probability of winning. Our experimental design shows that such a preference is not mainly due to a lack of understanding. We conclude that subjects avoid ambiguity \textit{per se} rather than avoiding ambiguity because it may yield a worse outcome. Such behavior cannot be reconciled with existing models of ambiguity aversion in a straightforward manner.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- June 2022
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2206.04605
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2206.04605
- Bibcode:
- 2022arXiv220604605J
- Keywords:
-
- Economics - Theoretical Economics;
- Economics - Econometrics