Bayesian evidence-driven diagnosis of instrumental systematics for sky-averaged 21-cm cosmology experiments
Abstract
We demonstrate the effectiveness of a Bayesian evidence -based analysis for diagnosing and disentangling the sky-averaged 21-cm signal from instrumental systematic effects. As a case study, we consider a simulated REACH pipeline with an injected systematic. We demonstrate that very poor performance or erroneous signal recovery is achieved if the systematic remains unmodelled. These effects include sky-averaged 21-cm posterior estimates resembling a very deep or wide signal. However, when including parameterised models of the systematic, the signal recovery is dramatically improved in performance. Most importantly, a Bayesian evidence-based model comparison is capable of determining whether or not such a systematic model is needed as the true underlying generative model of an experimental dataset is in principle unknown. We, therefore, advocate a pipeline capable of testing a variety of potential systematic errors with the Bayesian evidence acting as the mechanism for detecting their presence.
- Publication:
-
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
- Pub Date:
- October 2022
- DOI:
- 10.1017/pasa.2022.49
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2204.04445
- Bibcode:
- 2022PASA...39...52S
- Keywords:
-
- Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
- E-Print:
- accepted to PASA