Let the Mathematics of Quantum Speak: Allowed and Unallowed Logic
Abstract
Some notes about quantum physics, an interpretation if one wishes, are put forward, insisting on `closely following the mathematics/formalism, the `nuts and bolts of what quantum physics says'. These, basically well-known, issues seem to highlight some rather bold points about the `logic' aspect in quantum physics, necessarily restricting when and which logic may be admissible. And one may understand why that path is hardly followed in the literature. The mathematics/formalism of quantum, compared with classical, physics, may be fairly basically characterized by non-commutative algebras replacing commutative. These classically appearing, in fact, in dealing with systems of possibilities (say, all possible planetary motions under gravity of which one is the actual one). In particular, contrary to too common usage, the quantum non-commutativity should make it impossible to simply `transcend' the `system of possibilities' aspect into a `yes-no' logic essential for an `actual world'. One may have the latter only in a `haven' of approximately commutative algebras of `quasi-classical macroscopic observables', and moreover that `yes-no actual world' would plainly be an `extra ingredient' to the base quantum theory itself.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- December 2021
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2112.15222
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2112.15222
- Bibcode:
- 2021arXiv211215222L
- Keywords:
-
- Quantum Physics;
- Mathematics - Functional Analysis
- E-Print:
- 14 pages. A readaptation of parts of my arXiv:1207.7155