Reply to "Comment on `Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager ideal turbulence theory' "
Abstract
We refute the criticism expressed in a Comment by Krstulovic, L'vov, and Nazarenko [Phys. Rev. E 105, 027101 (2022), 10.1103/PhysRevE.105.027101] on our paper [Phys. Rev. E 103, 023106 (2021), 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.023106]. We first show that quantization of circulation is not ignored in our analysis. Then, we propose a more sophisticated analysis to avoid a subtle problem with the regularity of the velocity field. We thus defend the main results of our paper, which predicts the double-cascade scenario where the quantum stress cascade follows the Richardson cascade. We also provide a conjecture on the relation between the Kelvin-wave cascade and the quantum stress cascade.
- Publication:
-
Physical Review E
- Pub Date:
- February 2022
- DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.105.027102
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2111.11659
- Bibcode:
- 2022PhRvE.105b7102T
- Keywords:
-
- Physics - Fluid Dynamics;
- Condensed Matter - Other Condensed Matter
- E-Print:
- 4 pages