Plasticity as a link between spatially explicit, distance-independent, and whole-stand forest growth models
Abstract
Models at various levels of resolution are commonly used, both for forest management and in ecological research. They all have comparative advantages and disadvantages, making desirable a better understanding of the relationships between the various approaches. It is found that accounting for crown and root plasticity creates more realistic links between spatial and non-spatial models than simply ignoring spatial structure. The article reviews also the connection between distance-independent models and size distributions, and how distributions evolve over time and relate to whole-stand descriptions. In addition, some ways in which stand-level knowledge feeds back into detailed individual-tree formulations are demonstrated. The presentation intends to be accessible to non-specialists. Study implications: Introducing plasticity improves the representation of physio-ecological processes in spatial modelling. Plasticity explains in part the practical success of distance-independent models. The nature of size distributions and their relationship to individual-tree and whole-stand models are discussed. I point out limitations of various approaches and questions for future research.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- May 2021
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2106.01867
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2106.01867
- Bibcode:
- 2021arXiv210601867G
- Keywords:
-
- Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution;
- Statistics - Applications
- E-Print:
- 9 pages, 8 figures. Submitted manuscript. Version 2 with minor changes: expanded caption in Fig. 2, new Fig. 6, corrected Wikipedia reference, fix typos