Design and Analysis of group-sequential clinical trials based on a modestly-weighted log-rank test in anticipation of a delayed separation of survival curves: A practical guidance
Abstract
A common feature of many recent trials evaluating the effects of immunotherapy on survival is that non-proportional hazards can be anticipated at the design stage. This raises the possibility to use a statistical method tailored towards testing the purported long-term benefit, rather than applying the more standard log-rank test and/or Cox model. Many such proposals have been made in recent years, but there remains a lack of practical guidance on implementation, particularly in the context of group-sequential designs. In this article, we aim to fill this gap. We discuss how the POPLAR trial, which compared immunotherapy versus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer, might have been re-designed to be more robust to the presence of a delayed effect. We then provide step-by-step instructions on how to analyse a hypothetical realisation of the trial, based on this new design. Basic theory on weighted log-rank tests and group-sequential methods is covered, and an accompanying R package (including vignette) is provided.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- February 2021
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2102.05535
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2102.05535
- Bibcode:
- 2021arXiv210205535M
- Keywords:
-
- Statistics - Applications
- E-Print:
- Resubmitted after revision