Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims
Abstract
Fact-checking is the task of verifying the veracity of claims by assessing their assertions against credible evidence. The vast majority of fact-checking studies focus exclusively on political claims. Very little research explores fact-checking for other topics, specifically subject matters for which expertise is required. We present the first study of explainable fact-checking for claims which require specific expertise. For our case study we choose the setting of public health. To support this case study we construct a new dataset PUBHEALTH of 11.8K claims accompanied by journalist crafted, gold standard explanations (i.e., judgments) to support the fact-check labels for claims. We explore two tasks: veracity prediction and explanation generation. We also define and evaluate, with humans and computationally, three coherence properties of explanation quality. Our results indicate that, by training on in-domain data, gains can be made in explainable, automated fact-checking for claims which require specific expertise.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- October 2020
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2010.09926
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2010.09926
- Bibcode:
- 2020arXiv201009926K
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computation and Language;
- Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence
- E-Print:
- Accepted to EMNLP 2020. 15 pages, 7 figures, 9 tables. The dataset is available at https://github.com/neemakot/Health-Fact-Checking