Online Nash Social Welfare Maximization with Predictions
Abstract
We consider the problem of allocating a set of divisible goods to $N$ agents in an online manner, aiming to maximize the Nash social welfare, a widely studied objective which provides a balance between fairness and efficiency. The goods arrive in a sequence of $T$ periods and the value of each agent for a good is adversarially chosen when the good arrives. We first observe that no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio better than the trivial $O(N)$, unless it is given additional information about the agents' values. Then, in line with the emerging area of "algorithms with predictions", we consider a setting where for each agent, the online algorithm is only given a prediction of her monopolist utility, i.e., her utility if all goods were given to her alone (corresponding to the sum of her values over the $T$ periods). Our main result is an online algorithm whose competitive ratio is parameterized by the multiplicative errors in these predictions. The algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of $O(\log N)$ and $O(\log T)$ if the predictions are perfectly accurate. Moreover, the competitive ratio degrades smoothly with the errors in the predictions, and is surprisingly robust: the logarithmic competitive ratio holds even if the predictions are very inaccurate. We complement this positive result by showing that our bounds are essentially tight: no online algorithm, even if provided with perfectly accurate predictions, can achieve a competitive ratio of $O(\log^{1-\epsilon} N)$ or $O(\log^{1-\epsilon} T)$ for any constant $\epsilon>0$.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- August 2020
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2008.03564
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2008.03564
- Bibcode:
- 2020arXiv200803564B
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory;
- Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms;
- Mathematics - Optimization and Control
- E-Print:
- Corrected a mistake in the proof of Lemma 4