The Past Hypothesis and the Nature of Physical Laws
Abstract
If the Past Hypothesis underlies the arrows of time, what is the status of the Past Hypothesis? In this paper, I examine the role of the Past Hypothesis in the Boltzmannian account and defend the view that the Past Hypothesis is a candidate fundamental law of nature. Such a view is known to be compatible with Humeanism about laws, but as I argue it is also supported by a minimal non-Humean "governing" view. Some worries arise from the non-dynamical and time-dependent character of the Past Hypothesis as a boundary condition, the intrinsic vagueness in its specification, and the nature of the initial probability distribution. I show that these worries do not have much force, and in any case they become less relevant in a new quantum framework for analyzing time's arrows -- the Wentaculus. Hence, the view that the Past Hypothesis is a candidate fundamental law should be more widely accepted than it is now.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- August 2020
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2008.00611
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2008.00611
- Bibcode:
- 2020arXiv200800611K
- Keywords:
-
- Physics - History and Philosophy of Physics;
- Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics;
- General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology;
- Quantum Physics
- E-Print:
- Forthcoming in Barry Loewer, Eric Winsberg, and Brad Weslake (eds.), Time's Arrows and the Probability Structure of the World, Harvard University Press