A well-timed shift from local to global agreements accelerates climate change mitigation
Abstract
Recent attempts at cooperating on climate change mitigation highlight the limited efficacy of large-scale negotiations, when commitment to mitigation is costly and initially rare. Deepening existing voluntary mitigation pledges could require more stringent, legally-binding agreements that currently remain untenable at the global scale. Building-blocks approaches promise greater success by localizing agreements to regions or few-nation summits, but risk slowing mitigation adoption globally. Here, we show that a well-timed policy shift from local to global legally-binding agreements can dramatically accelerate mitigation compared to using only local, only global, or both agreement types simultaneously. This highlights the scale-specific roles of mitigation incentives: local agreements promote and sustain mitigation commitments in early-adopting groups, after which global agreements rapidly draw in late-adopting groups. We conclude that focusing negotiations on local legally-binding agreements and, as these become common, a renewed pursuit of stringent, legally-binding world-wide agreements could best overcome many current challenges facing climate mitigation.
- Publication:
-
Nature Communications
- Pub Date:
- 2021
- DOI:
- 10.1038/s41467-021-23056-5
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2007.13238
- Bibcode:
- 2021NatCo..12.2908K
- Keywords:
-
- Nonlinear Sciences - Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems;
- Economics - General Economics
- E-Print:
- doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23056-5