How Much Propositional Logic Suffices for Rosser's Essential Undecidability Theorem?
Abstract
In this paper we explore the following question: how weak can a logic be for Rosser's essential undecidability result to be provable for a weak arithmetical theory? It is well known that Robinson's Q is essentially undecidable in intuitionistic logic, and P. Hajek proved it in the fuzzy logic BL for Grzegorczyk's variant of Q which interprets the arithmetic operations as non-total non-functional relations. We present a proof of essential undecidability in a much weaker substructural logic and for a much weaker arithmetic theory, a version of Robinson's R (with arithmetic operations also interpreted as mere relations). Our result is based on a structural version of the undecidability argument introduced by Kleene and we show that it goes well beyond the scope of the Boolean, intuitionistic, or fuzzy logic.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- June 2020
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2006.12275
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2006.12275
- Bibcode:
- 2020arXiv200612275B
- Keywords:
-
- Mathematics - Logic