On the relation between structured $d$-DNNFs and SDDs
Abstract
Structured $d$-DNNFs and SDDs are restricted negation normal form circuits used in knowledge compilation as target languages into which propositional theories are compiled. Structuredness is imposed by so-called vtrees. By definition SDDs are restricted structured $d$-DNNFs. Beame and Liew (2015) as well as Bova and Szeider (2017) mentioned the question whether structured $d$-DNNFs are really more general than SDDs w.r.t. polynomial-size representations (w.r.t. the number of Boolean variables the represented functions are defined on.) The main result in the paper is the proof that a function can be represented by SDDs of polynomial size if the function and its complement have polynomial-size structured $d$-DNNFs that respect the same vtree.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- December 2019
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01430
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1912.01430
- Bibcode:
- 2019arXiv191201430B
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computational Complexity;
- Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence;
- Computational Complexity (cs.CC);
- Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI);
- F.1.3;
- I.2
- E-Print:
- 16 pages. The main result of the paper generalizes one of the results from paper arXiv:1802.04544 where unambiguous nondeterministic OBDDs are considered which can be seen as restricted structured $d$-DNNFs