A game theoretic setting of capitation versus fee-for-service payment systems
Abstract
We aim to determine whether a game-theoretic model between an insurer and a healthcare practice yields a predictive equilibrium that incentivizes either player to deviate from a fee-for-service to capitation payment system. Using United States data from various primary care surveys, we find that non-extreme equilibria (i.e., shares of patients, or shares of patient visits, seen under a fee-for-service payment system) can be derived from a Stackelberg game if insurers award a non-linear bonus to practices based on performance. Overall, both insurers and practices can be incentivized to embrace capitation payments somewhat, but potentially at the expense of practice performance.
- Publication:
-
PLoS ONE
- Pub Date:
- October 2019
- DOI:
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0223672
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1904.11604
- Bibcode:
- 2019PLoSO..1423672K
- Keywords:
-
- Economics - General Economics
- E-Print:
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223672