Knowledge and Blameworthiness
Abstract
Blameworthiness of an agent or a coalition of agents is often defined in terms of the principle of alternative possibilities: for the coalition to be responsible for an outcome, the outcome must take place and the coalition should have had a strategy to prevent it. In this article we argue that in the settings with imperfect information, not only should the coalition have had a strategy, but it also should have known that it had a strategy, and it should have known what the strategy was. The main technical result of the article is a sound and complete bimodal logic that describes the interplay between knowledge and blameworthiness in strategic games with imperfect information.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- November 2018
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1811.02446
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1811.02446
- Bibcode:
- 2018arXiv181102446N
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence;
- Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory;
- Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science