Computational geometry and the U.S. Supreme Court
Abstract
We use the United States Supreme Court as an illuminative context in which to discuss three different spatial voting preference models: an instance of the widely used single-peaked preferences, and two models that are more novel in which vote outcomes have a strength in addition to a location. We introduce each model from a formal axiomatic perspective, briefly discuss practical motivation for each in terms of judicial behavior, prove mathematical relationships among the voting coalitions compatible with each model, and then study the two-dimensional setting by presenting computational tools for working with the models and by exploring these with judicial voting data from the Supreme Court.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- October 2018
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1810.11704
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1810.11704
- Bibcode:
- 2018arXiv181011704G
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computational Geometry;
- Computer Science - Computers and Society;
- Physics - Physics and Society;
- 91C15;
- 91B12;
- 52C99
- E-Print:
- 14 pages, 6 figures