Quantum mechanics and modeling of physical reality
Abstract
Quantum mechanics (QM) has led to spectacular technological developments, including the discovery of new constituents of matter and new materials: however, there is still no consensus regarding its interpretation and limitations. Some scientists and scientific writers promote some exotic interpretations and evoke quantum magic. In this paper we point out that magical explanations mean the end of the science. Magical explanations are misleading and counterproductive. We explain how a simple probabilistic local causal model is able to reproduce quantum correlations in Bell tests. We also discuss the difficulties of mathematical modeling of the physical reality and dangers of incorrect mental images. We examine in detail when and how a probabilistic model may completely describe a random experiment. We give some arguments in favor of the contextual statistical interpretation of QM. We conclude that we still do not know whether quantum theory provides a complete description of physical phenomena and we explain how it may be tested. We also point out, that there remain several open questions and challenges in QM, in quantum field theory and in the Standard Model. Moreover, there is still no consensus about how to reconcile quantum theory with general relativity and cosmology.
- Publication:
-
Physica Scripta
- Pub Date:
- December 2018
- DOI:
- 10.1088/1402-4896/aae212
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1804.02288
- Bibcode:
- 2018PhyS...93l3001K
- Keywords:
-
- Quantum Physics;
- Physics - History and Philosophy of Physics
- E-Print:
- 13 pages,90 references. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:quant-ph/0208061, in this a second version I added 3 references, corrected some misprints and make some minor style improvements