Machine-learning the string landscape
Abstract
We propose a paradigm to apply machine learning various databases which have emerged in the study of the string landscape. In particular, we establish neural networks as both classifiers and predictors and train them with a host of available data ranging from Calabi-Yau manifolds and vector bundles, to quiver representations for gauge theories, using a novel framework of recasting geometrical and physical data as pixelated images. We find that even a relatively simple neural network can learn many significant quantities to astounding accuracy in a matter of minutes and can also predict hithertofore unencountered results, whereby rendering the paradigm a valuable tool in physics as well as pure mathematics.
</ce:displayed-quote> Of course, this paradigm is useful not only to physicists but to also to mathematicians; for instance, could our NN be trained well enough to approximate bundle cohomology calculations? This, and a host of other examples, we will now examine.</ce:para>Methodology Neural networks are known for their complexity, involving usually a complicated directed graph each node of which is a ;perceptron; (an activation function imitating a neuron) and amongst the multitude of which there are many arrows encoding input/output. Throughout this letter, we will use a rather simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) consisting of 5 layers, three of which are hidden, with activation functions typically of the form of a logistic sigmoid or a hyperbolic tangent. The input layer is a linear layer of 100 to 1000 nodes, recognizing a tensor (as we will soon see, algebro-geometric objects such as Calabi-Yau manifolds or polytopes are generically configurations of integer tensors) and the output layer is a summation layer giving a number corresponding to a Hodge number, or to rank of a cohomology group, etc. Such an MLP can be implemented, for instance, on the latest versions of Wolfram Mathematica. With 500-1000 training rounds, the running time is merely about 5-20 minutes on an ordinary laptop. It is reassuring and pleasantly surprising that even such a relatively simple NN can achieve the level of accuracy shortly to be presented.</ce:para>This letter is a companion summary of the longer paper[42]where the interested reader can find more details of the computations and the data.</ce:para>- Publication:
-
Physics Letters B
- Pub Date:
- November 2017
- DOI:
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1706.02714
- Bibcode:
- 2017PhLB..774..564H
- Keywords:
-
- High Energy Physics - Theory;
- High Energy Physics - Phenomenology;
- Mathematics - Algebraic Geometry;
- Statistics - Machine Learning
- E-Print:
- 35 pages, 4 figures, code available, refs and comments added on v2, substantial updates on training curves and validation on v3