Permutation groups containing a regular abelian subgroup: the tangled history of two mistakes of Burnside
Abstract
A group K is said to be a B-group if every permutation group containing K as a regular subgroup is either imprimitive or 2-transitive. In the second edition of his influential textbook on finite groups, Burnside published a proof that cyclic groups of composite prime-power degree are B-groups. Ten years later in 1921 he published a proof that every abelian group of composite degree is a B-group. Both proofs are character-theoretic and both have serious flaws. Indeed, the second result is false. In this note we explain these flaws and prove that every cyclic group of composite order is a B-group, using only Burnside's character-theoretic methods. We also survey the related literature, prove some new results on B-groups of prime-power order, state two related open problems and present some new computational data.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- May 2017
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1705.07502
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1705.07502
- Bibcode:
- 2017arXiv170507502W
- Keywords:
-
- Mathematics - Group Theory;
- Mathematics - Representation Theory;
- 20B05;
- secondary 20B15;
- 20C20
- E-Print:
- 24 pages