Memristor Equations: Incomplete Physics and Undefined Passivity/Activity
Abstract
In his seminal paper, Chua presented a fundamental physical claim by introducing the memristor, “The missing circuit element”. The memristor equations were originally supposed to represent a passive circuit element because, with active circuitry, arbitrary elements can be realized without limitations. Therefore, if the memristor equations do not guarantee that the circuit element can be realized by a passive system, the fundamental physics claims about the memristor as “missing circuit element” loses all its weight. The question of passivity/activity belongs to physics thus we incorporate thermodynamics into the study of this problem. We show that the memristor equations are physically incomplete regarding the problem of passivity/activity. As a consequence, the claim that the present memristor functions describe a passive device lead to unphysical results, such as violating the Second Law of thermodynamics, in infinitely large number of cases. The seminal memristor equations cannot introduce a new physical circuit element without making the model more physical such as providing the Fluctuation-Dissipation Theory of memristors.
- Publication:
-
Fluctuation and Noise Letters
- Pub Date:
- 2017
- DOI:
- 10.1142/S0219477517710018
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1703.09064
- Bibcode:
- 2017FNL....1671001S
- Keywords:
-
- Memristors;
- incomplete models;
- activity;
- passivity;
- Computer Science - Emerging Technologies
- E-Print:
- Accepted for publication in Fluctuation and Noise Letters (August 5)